Only three here — not because the logic stops, but because nobody's asked about a fourth yet. The reasoning lives in our playbooks; the logic framework does the thinking, AI just draws the picture.
Eurostat hourly cost × OECD annual hours = annual employer cost per head. The regional layer stays separate. The user's own weights do the ranking. Every cell reproduces on a calculator.
Public information only, in. A ±4 band on every score. Overlapping bands are never ranked against each other. A flag is a reason to look, not a conclusion.
Each executive question checks for its own required inputs. Missing input → the gap is named, never estimated around. Three honest labels: answered, partial, cannot tell you.
Inside our own tooling, any figure in any of the six tools becomes a trace like these in about a minute — generated from the recipe the moment you ask, not pre-drawn. That can't run on a static page, and we'd rather show you than claim it. Come and meet us: pick a number, any number, and watch it draw itself.
We'll gladly show you live when we meet →We didn't pre-build a trace for every number across six tools, whether or not anyone would ever ask. That's the speculative AI spend we built Stonefield to argue against. The logic behind each figure lives as a structured recipe — source, transformation, rule, output — and the picture is drawn only when the question is real.
What's on this page is the exception that proves it: three traces, drawn once, so you can see what a trace looks like before you ask for your own.